Cover
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025)

Published: December 14, 2025

Pages: 5-13

Research Article

Using Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) to Assess Geotechnical Properties of Subbase Type B, C and D

Zainab Falih Alyasiri 1 Osamah S. Abdulkareem Al-Salih Ammar J. Dakhil
1Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Collage, Basrah University, Iraq
History
  • Received: July 24, 2025
  • Revised: September 13, 2025
  • Accepted: October 10, 2025
  • Available Online: December 14, 2025

Abstract

As infrastructure development accelerates, ensuring the quality of the subbase layer in roadworks has become increasingly vital. Among various evaluation tools, the Dynamic Cone Penetration (DCP) test is widely recognized for its practical advantages—namely its ease of use, affordability, and ability to deliver real-time, continuous assessments of soil strength directly on-site without disturbing the ground. The research involved conducting both DCP and SRM tests on subbase materials classified as types B, C, and D, which are frequently utilized in Basra’s Road construction. The investigation measured parameters such as the Dynamic Cone Penetration Index (DCPI), moisture content, and dry density under three distinct moisture conditions, all assessed within a controlled laboratory setting. Results were analyzed using SPSS (version 27), revealing a strong inverse relationship between dry density and DCPI, A direct correlation between DCPI and moisture content and between moisture content and dry density. Three predictive equations were developed for each subbase type. The approach has proven to streamline testing processes by minimizing time and resource demands, making it a credible and efficient alternative to conventional subgrade resistance methods for field-based soil assessment.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Scala, “Simple methods of flexible pavement design using cone penetrometers,” Proc. 2nd Aust. NZ Conf. Soil Mech. Found. Eng., Christchurch, pp. 73–83, 1956.
  2. ASTM D6951, Standard Test Method for Use of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Shallow Pavement Applications, ASTM International, 2009.
  3. B. W. Clegg, “An impact soil test for road construction,” Aust. Road Res., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 3–15, 1979.
  4. H. G. B. Allersma, Soil behavior under dynamic loading, Delft Univ. Research Rep., 1989.
  5. S. L. Webster, Force Projection Site Evaluation Using the Electric Cone Penetrometer (ECP) and the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP), Wright Lab., USAF Academy, CO, 1994.
  6. P. W. Jayawickrama, A. Prasad, and S. Senadheera, “Use of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Pavement Evaluation,” Center for Multidisciplinary Research in Transportation, Texas Tech Univ., 2000.
  7. J. M. Konrad and D. Lachance, “Use of in situ penetration tests in pavement evaluation,” Can. Geotech. J., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 924–935, 2001.
  8. J. E. Herrick and T. L. Jones, “A dynamic cone penetrometer for measuring soil penetration resistance,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., vol. 66, pp. 1320–1324, 2002.
  9. F. Amini, Potential Applications of Dynamic and Static Cone Penetrometers in MDOT Pavement Design and Construction, Final Rep., Mississippi DOT, 2003.
  10. S. D. Mohammadi, M. R. Nikoudel, H. Rahimi, and M. Khamehchiyan, “Application of the dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) for determination of the engineering parameters of sandy soils,” Eng. Geol., vol. 101, pp. 195–203, 2008.
  11. C. N. Rao, V. George, and R. Shivashankar, “PFWD, CBR and DCP evaluation of lateritic subgrades of Dakshina Kannada, India,” 2008.
  12. H. Kim, M. Prezzi, and R. Salgado, Use of Dynamic Cone Penetration and Clegg Hammer Tests for Quality Control of Roadway Compaction and Construction, FHWA/IN/JTRP-2010/27, Joint Transp. Res. Program, Indiana DOT and Purdue Univ., USA, 2010.
  13. A. Mohajerani et al., “A practical technique for the compaction control of sand in road construction using a dynamic lightweight cone penetrometer,” Road Mater. Pavement Des, 2019.
  14. A. M. Hamid, Assessment of Density and Shear Strength of Eastern Saudi Sands Using Dynamic Cone Penetration Testing (DCPT), M.Sc. thesis, King Fahd Univ. Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, 2013.
  15. H. Kim, Dynamic Analysis of Dynamic Cone Penetration Test for Subgrade Compaction Assessment, Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue Univ., 2014.
  16. M. Patrick, “Dynamic cone penetrometer: A review of its applications and correlations,” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol., vol. 10, no. 3, 2017.
  17. Y. M. Alshkane, K. A. Rashed, and H. S. Daoud, “Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and compressibility indices predictions from dynamic cone penetrometer index (DCP) for cohesive soil in Kurdistan Region/Iraq,” Geotech. Geol. Eng., vol. 38, pp. 3683–3695, 2020.
  18. R. Salgado and S. Yoon, Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT) for Subgrade Assessment, FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/30, Joint Transp. Res. Program, Indiana DOT and Purdue Univ., 2003.
  19. R. Jadid, I. N. Chowdhury, and M. F. Alam, “Development of empirical correlation between dynamic cone resistance and relative density of sand,” in Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Civil Infrastructure Constr. Mater., MIST, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. 1–8, 2015.
  20. State Corporation of Roads and Bridges (SCRB), General Specifications for Roads and Bridges – Section R9: Subbase, Ministry of Housing and Construction, Republic of Iraq, 2003.
  21. A. Livneh and P. Langevitz, “Diagnostic and treatment concerns in familial Mediterranean fever,” Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 477–498, 2000.
  22. J. H. Lee, Y. J. Park, and D. Kim, “Field evaluation of DCP for estimating subgrade modulus,” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 789–796, 2019.
  23. M. Eshan, Evaluation of Soil Subgrade Strength for Pavement Design, Mississippi State Univ., 2014.
  24. J. E. Bowles, Foundation Analysis and Design, 3rd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
  25. M. D. Bolton et al., “Centrifuge cone penetration tests in sand,” Geotechnique, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 543–552, 1999.
  26. J. Garnier et al., “Catalogue of scaling laws and similitude questions in geotechnical centrifuge modelling,” Int. J. Phys. Mod. Geotech., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–23, 2007.
  27. B. M. Das, Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering, 4th ed., Brooks/Cole, 2000.
  28. T. J. Santner, B. J. Williams, and W. I. Notz, The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, Springer, 2003.
  29. Y. Zhang, N. Meratnia, and P. Havinga, “A taxonomy framework for unsupervised outlier detection techniques for multi-type data sets,” Comput., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 355–363, 2007.
  30. A. Field, Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 3rd ed., SAGE Publications, 2009.
  31. J. Pallant, SPSS Survival Manual, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill Education, 2020